Trump vs. Dems vs. Israel: not taking sides, just quoting
You know what he said: I’m not saying they’re eating cats and dogs, I’m just repeating what was reported. I also might have a bridge to sell, if you’re interested. Or a $100,000 watch that’s a complete kitsch.
I’ll not take sides this time. I already told you that he’s going to win, despite becoming increasingly incoherent and disconnected from reality. I just want to mention two articles I ran over by pure chance. They seem kinda worth reading, but I’ll only quote fragments of them, without further comments. They’re both written by Jacob Weindling, who also wrote ✍️ George Orwell Was a Socialist, You Colossal Idiots.
These articles include tweets with text, photos and videos, so please fucking disable the “anti-spy” features in your browser. Nobody fucking cares about you. You’re a number to advertisers (a hash, actually), and you’re nobody to the Establishment. Hopefully you’re not a terrorist, a pedophile, or a drug dealer. It’s like participating in public demonstrations with a t-shirt that reads “FUCK THE GOVERNMENT!” but refusing to say who you voted for, “because the vote is secret.” Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. And your cojones are made of cotton wool.
From ✍️ Why I Am Begrudgingly Voting for Kamala Harris
I understand how this vote can seem contradictory to my well-established position that Kamala Harris has been part of an administration that has consciously fueled a genocide, and I don’t blame anyone for calling me a hypocrite because I sure feel like one casting it, but I also have come to accept that’s a natural consequence of being an American. In a perfect world, the Democratic Party would collapse into the dustbin of history where it belongs so it can make way for a new kind of political party that isn’t in thrall to soulless consultants and fundraisers who believe in nothing other than the next election cycle and whose entire reason to get up in the morning is so they can scam seniors out of their life savings. But if the last year has taught us anything, we live in the opposite of a perfect world.
I hate how many Democratic partisans take the posture of, “tough shit, it’s a binary system, so what choice do you have? We have to back the Dems no matter what.” This kind of flippant attitude is one of the big reasons the Democrats have been so successful shifting right, as their voters have been trained to treat compromise of any kind as a virtue unto itself while shaming anyone who doesn’t fall in line with whatever happens to be the party priority at the current moment. This is how you wind up with a situation where people who were decrying Trump’s immigration policies as unspeakably evil eight years ago are now echoing the Democratic Party’s stance that Trump’s immigration policies are now just common-sense bipartisan solutions while the Democratic presidential nominee criticizes Trump for not building enough border wall.
This is the hardest vote I have ever had to cast. I wrote “How Can You Vote for the People Committing a Genocide” to voice my fundamental concern around the morality of this choice. In that article, I wrote that I generally view voting as strategic pittance we are afforded as citizens of this “democracy,” and I don’t ascribe much of a moral value to my actions when I’m participating in our morally bankrupt system. But this is a bridge too far. The only thing that could push me back over it is a similar threat on the other side–and there is–one who is classifying you and me and everyone else who isn’t a part of his cult as the “enemy within” while waxing poetic about Hitler’s generals.
I also hate when liberals lecture people about the danger of Trump. If someone is being flippant about a second Trump presidency, sure, educate them. But we lived through one already, most people are well aware of what he is capable of and how seriously to take his vast array of authoritarian promises, and focusing solely on Trump has a way of giving a pass to the Biden-Harris administration’s horrific record.
What partisan liberals need to understand is that the Biden administration fueling Israel’s genocide of Palestine put Democrats on a level of evil at or above Trump in many people’s eyes, especially those with loved ones under Israel’s siege. The embrace of Trump’s immigration policy and the Dick Cheney bearhug does not make them look much, or any, better than the Republican Party to many others who remember the world before Trump distorted it. Doing idiotic things like this below does not help either. The Democrats are incompetent and deserve to lose to a bloviating game show host with his brain seeping out his ears.
So why am I voting for someone who is part of an administration that if I had my druthers, I would lock every person in it away in the Hague forever? Three reasons.
Trump Is Worse for the Left
Writing as someone with contacts in lefty movements, I can confirm that there is at least a level of consistent communication between activist groups and Democratic members of Congress and the executive branch. How effective it is, who knows, but we at least have a seat at the table in a way we never have before, and that seat is gone if Trump wins.
The left has made real progress. Don’t take this for granted. We got Joe freaking Biden to pass the most ambitious climate policy in American history and it’s working. A significant portion of the Democratic base is sympathetic to socialist ideas, more so than they are to capitalist ones according to a Data for Progress poll from 2022. I totally understand the burn-it-all-down feeling because this depraved fucking system deserves it, but that includes our victories too. The Democrats will shift right if they lose, that is clear as day from how they have run this election (just look at how willing the Dems were to step back and watch Reps. Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush get picked off by AIPAC). The left will be the biggest losers of a Trump presidency while Dick Cheney gets an office at the DNC.
As Naomi Klein noted, don’t ever assume that it cannot get worse.
The article includes a thread of tweets by Waleed Shahid. Then it goes on.
I Have a Duty to Protect Vulnerable People
Israel’s genocide of Gaza is and has been the biggest story in the world for the last year. I am a Jew who has never bought into this colonial vision of Israel, and the plight of the Palestinians has been at the forefront of my concerns. It still is as the genocide accelerates in the north and Israel expands its war to Lebanon–all enthusiastically backed by the United States only issuing tepid red lines they never planned to adhere to in the first place. I consider the Biden administration and his State Department and everyone in Congress who has voted to arm and enable Israel’s genocide an enemy of humanity.
But Trump is promising “a really violent day” in his bid to deport tens of millions of people from America. He has long been infatuated with our nuclear arsenal, so much so that he wanted to use it on a freaking hurricane. There are an endless line of hawks in D.C. lined up to encourage him to realize their half-century-long goal of waging war on Iran, and a Trump election would surely place the world the closest it has been to nuclear conflict since the Cold War. North Korea, who he wanted to nuke and blame someone else for it, entering the war in Ukraine, is another harrowing global development pointed towards Trump’s worst instincts.
Not to mention that all the smart money in the world is betting on Trump’s economic policies bringing us certain doom, and if you are a lefty who believes that economic malaise is at the root of fascism’s appeal, then fascism should only get more appealing to more people under a Trump-driven economic crash. He has already helped take away a women’s right to choose in America and would continue the fight to restrict the fundamental human rights of women, all while promising to use the military to put down protest movements against him. Hysteric #Resistance liberals are right about one thing: fascism is indeed at our doorstep.
Some may point out that I live in one of the 43 states that do not matter to the electoral college, which dramatically lessens the impact of my vote, but the popular vote is still important. Not because there is a value Harris can win by where Trump will accept that he has lost, but because Trump will claim he won the election no matter what, and the war after it is going to be fought partially in the court of public opinion where things like the popular vote will matter. Unless you live in Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina or Georgia, your vote does not matter to this broken imperialistic system, but it still does to the people living underneath its boot.
This Isn’t a Democracy Anyway
If you think at this point that the United States is a genuine democracy, then I am sorry, but you are more naive than adults who still believe in Santa Claus. This has never been a democracy for, by and of the people. Women have had the right to vote for just 16 years longer than slavery existed as a legal institution in America.
America was founded as an aristocratic republic, a nation run by land-owning white men to rule over their subjects, a dynamic which still endures to this day. Socialists are fond of correctly saying there is no ethical consumption under capitalism, and that applies to interacting with the largest government that is a wholly owned subsidiary of global capitalism too. Voting for either political party is a vote for an empire which has proven itself to be opposed to the overall progress of mankind, but voting for the Green Party is to be duped by a vanity candidate who floats in once every four years to pretend she’s some principled warrior while never building any lefty power in the intervening period.
In short, we’re fucked, so don’t put too much pressure on yourself for facing down the atrocious choices you have been presented.
The decision is between people who have done a genocide and a man who openly aspires to do more. This is the United States of America with its mask off. The Democrats are forever branded as the party of war criminals, and they are also the best that this sclerotic, decaying 18th century system built as a compromise between slave owners and slavery financiers has to offer its people. When you consider both how fundamentally and intentionally broken this all is, it becomes a lot easier to detach any moral value from your vote. That doesn’t change the fact that this vote rewards people who are authoring a genocide, but such is life in a collapsing empire.
I am voting for Kamala Harris because I want to protect the gains the left has made in the Biden era as well as the billions of people who are most under threat from Trump. Her participation in Israel’s genocide of Gaza is unforgivable and should appear at the top of her record forever.
⌛ INTERLUDE
Dennis Quaid, for whom Reagan was the best president in history and Trump the best in the 21st century. Full speech at Trump’s Rally in Coachella, CA – 10/12/24.
Arnold Schwarzenegger endorses Kamala Harris: ‘I will always be an American before I am a Republican’. Full tweet:
I don’t really do endorsements. I’m not shy about sharing my views, but I hate politics and don’t trust most politicians.
I also understand that people want to hear from me because I am not just a celebrity, I am a former Republican Governor.
My time as Governor taught me to love policy and ignore politics. I’m proud of the work I did to help clean up our air, create jobs, balance the budget, make the biggest infrastructure investment in state history, and take power from the politicians and give it back to the people when it comes to our redistricting process and our primaries in California.
That’s policy. It requires working with the other side, not insulting them to win your next election, and I know it isn’t sexy to most people, but I love it when I can help make people’s lives better with policies, like I still do through my institute at USC, where we fight for clean air and stripping the power from the politicians who rig the system against the people.
Let me be honest with you: I don’t like either party right now. My Republicans have forgotten the beauty of the free market, driven up deficits, and rejected election results. Democrats aren’t any better at dealing with deficits, and I worry about their local policies hurting our cities with increased crime.
It is probably not a surprise that I hate politics more than ever, which, if you are a normal person who isn’t addicted to this crap, you probably understand.
I want to tune out.
But I can’t. Because rejecting the results of an election is as un-American as it gets. To someone like me who talks to people all over the world and still knows America is the shining city on a hill, calling America is a trash can for the world is so unpatriotic, it makes me furious.
And I will always be an American before I am a Republican.
That’s why, this week, I am voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.
I’m sharing it with all of you because I think there are a lot of you who feel like I do. You don’t recognize our country. And you are right to be furious.
For decades, we’ve talked about the national debt. For decades, we’ve talked about comprehensive immigration reform that secures the border while fixing our broken immigration system. And Washington does nothing.
The problems just keep rolling, and we all keep getting angrier, because the only people that benefit from problems aren’t you, the people. The only people that benefit from this crap are the politicians who prefer having talking points to win elections to the public service that will make Americans’ lives better.
It is a just game to them. But it is life for my fellow Americans. We should be pissed!
But a candidate who won’t respect your vote unless it is for him, a candidate who will send his followers to storm the Capitol while he watches with a Diet Coke, a candidate who has shown no ability to work to pass any policy besides a tax cut that helped his donors and other rich people like me but helped no one else else, a candidate who thinks Americans who disagree with him are the bigger enemies than China, Russia, or North Korea – that won’t solve our problems.
It will just be four more years of bullshit with no results that makes us angrier and angrier, more divided, and more hateful.
We need to close the door on this chapter of American history, and I know that former President Trump won’t do that. He will divide, he will insult, he will find new ways to be more un-American than he already has been, and we, the people, will get nothing but more anger.
That’s enough reason for me to share my vote with all of you. I want to move forward as a country, and even though I have plenty of disagreements with their platform, I think the only way to do that is with Harris and Walz.
Vote this week. Turn the page and put this junk behind us.
And even if you disagree with me, vote, because that’s what we do as Americans.
From ✍️ Israel’s Final Solution for Gaza Is Here
This weekend I saw a group of Gazans gather around a child whose arms had been shredded so badly by gunfire that they did not know how to pick them up to rescue them. As people gathered to try to help, they were hit by an Israeli airstrike (Warning: Graphic video here). I am increasingly at a loss for printable words over this genocide, as every day a new horror is authored by Israel, all while American politicians and diplomats pretend they care about Palestinians when their actions prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they do not.
This is genocide. It’s ethnic cleansing. Anyone denying this at this point is no different from someone who denies that my relative died in Auschwitz.
Israel has restricted food and aid to north Gaza for 21 days and counting now, making it clear for even the thickest skulls dulled by Western and Israeli government propaganda that the starvation of the people being bombed and sent on death marches is intentional.
We have known for some time that Israel has designated “kill zones” in Gaza where they shoot on site and declare anyone shot a terrorist (well, people who read Israeli sources like Haaretz know this—American mainstream news consumers have been fed a different world, one that has mostly resembled the one Benjamin Netanyahu wants to portray). Israel is now effectively making all of northern Gaza one of these kill zones, forcing people out in a mass bombing campaign that massacres scores of people every single night as they escalate their violent attacks in the north. Israeli assaults have been so sadistic that there are now multiple reports that IDF soldiers are becoming demoralized by the horrors they are perpetrating on Gaza, calling into question whether they even have a fighting force capable of achieving their ambitions of invading and occupying parts of Lebanon.
Like Ronald Reagan calling Israel’s relentless bombing of Lebanon a “Holocaust” in 1982, I use the term Final Solution intentionally to get the attention of my fellow Jews still lost in the desert and worshipping a golden calf, because the intentional starvation of Gaza by Israel can only be interpreted as such.
Us Jews should know this as much as anyone given how many different oppressors we have faced throughout history. To believe that we cannot become like any other people in the world is to take the “chosen people” moniker to a disturbing point. A point that enables one to dehumanize others, and do to them what so many have done to us.
Which is genocide.
This is genocide, and no one in the United States government has any urgency to ameliorate the suffering of the Palestinian people. Years from now, when history makes it clear who the monsters of this age were, don’t forget who enabled and cheerlead this. North Gaza is on the brink of something truly horrific that there is no coming back from, and the powers that be have ensured that all we can do is watch.
As for The horror of rewatching BrainDead in an election year, this is exactly what I’m going to do, because I missed it back in 2016, so I’ll watch it now. Not my elections, anyway.
Two decades in this country but never felt to get citizenship. You are right, Trump will win and me, if I had a vote, I would not vote for either of the two. Reasons? Many but mainly one; the complete psychopathy and sadism they both are. I find it pathetic that one or the other are worse; both are capable of exactly the same and if one does less or more is depending of their judgement at the moment of how much they can get away with it; that is it.
A third candidate is a good protest vote for the short term, but in the long term, in the best case scenario open the way for a national third party, and in the worse case scenario, will make republicans or democrats set more appropriate limits. That is why I detest that “A vote for Jill Stein (or a non vote) is a vote for Trump”; NO, a vote for Jill Stein is because there is an outcry for Palestinians (or inequality) and the genocidal Democratic party cannot compromise on even that! A vote for the Democrat is a REWARD to the DNC not allowing alternative candidates, a reward for not listening to the overwhelming majority of Americans on Palestine… Do you really think that is a good message to give them?!
Now, that a spoiled, racist and vengeful Trump is going to win, I want see the opportunities of a Trump’s government could bring to the world:
1) Those disappointed Democrat voters will wake up and realize the fools they were supporting the DNC’s choice, so very soon you will start seen protesting on the streets for Gaza, for the military industry, for the inequality… Yep, now Palestinians will be come human enough once again for them.
2) There is a chance he will dismantle the “intelligence apparatus” of the US.
3) European governments they will realize the US is not there for them, like with Ukraine (or Vietnam, or Iraq, or Afghanistan), the US just utilizes Europe for their own gain… Trump will be mean, Democrats smile more but both orchestrate a financial and industrial demise of Europe.
4) Trump on Palestine can go either way; he really does not like complicated or prolonged wars so, depending of who he brings along he could demand a quick end or go after Iran. If he goes after Iran, the US global empire will be over (so Israel as we know it). Trump, unlike most Democrats, does not grasp the limits o its military prowess.
5) On thing I was glad Trump won in 2016 (would not have voted for either of them either though) was that he was against confronting Russia in Syria while Hillary was completely into shooting Russian airplanes down not realizing Putin would not have let American bases untouched for that. With Hillary, WWIII would have been more than likely than not (Putin , for better or worse decide after Libya that that would have been the last time he is pushed away by the US!) Trump is nuclear war adverse so, at least for global population seems a better bet. Again, Trump is stupid and he can be easily persuaded one way or another by the cabinet he will end up with, but on principle, he is more adverse to a big war than the Clinton/Biden/Harris clan). That does not excuse his completely despise for poorer/darker people.
Linus Torvalds applied for the US citizenship (which he obviously got) for this reason alone: his kids were American citizens.
There’s a need for a wake-up call regarding 3), and some Europeans hope that a 2nd Trump administration would force Brussels to take decisive action. I’m skeptical; it’s too late.
Well, the entire Africa, big part of Asia and Latin America are waking up fast, even Saudis! I do see at least a few Europeans start questioning if following just the US (independently of who is in power) is the best approach.
Hum? Why he did apply?
I find it normal to get US citizenship (the US constitution is quite good in my view, it is the elite what is the problem but, one, only has to give oath to the constitution). In my case, I still do not feel ready, specially due to the disregard for the constitution spirit. Linus must be a godsend guy for many Linux fans but, my gosh, as a person I don’t see much there. I guess, many of these prodigies had to be lacking in other areas.
Linus Torvalds is the father of 3 blonde girls:
— Patricia Miranda Torvalds, born 5 December 1996
— Daniela Yolanda Torvalds, born 16 April 1998
— Celeste Amanda Torvalds, born 20 November 2000
For some reason, the first Torvalds to become a U.S. citizen was Daniela.
He owned for about 20 years a Mercedes SLK32 AMG: 3.2 L V6 supercharged, 260 kW (354 PS; 349 hp) at 6,100 rpm, produced from January 2001 to March 2004 (a total of 4,333 were produced; 2,056 were imported to the U.S.).
His SLK32 had the frame running around the outside of the plate to say “Mr. Linux. King of All Geeks” but the plate itself read “Dad of 3”.
His main car these days is an electric Volvo, which should be one of the following U.S. models: C40, XC40, EX90. In my view, the full-electric XC40 is the best choice, and it already gained some momentum here in Europe, but here it’s called EX40 (previously XC40 Recharge).
From Kamala to Zelenskyy, they keep pissing me off!
1. This Kamala win-ala thing at Saturday Night Live is utterly pathetic, and it will not change the mind of any voter!
2. Al Jazeera’a The Listening Post: Will Gaza lose Kamala Harris the presidency? I suppose so, but the bitch believes that if she vowed to end war in Gaza, she’d win: Harris made an explicit appeal to Arab American voters in Michigan on Sunday, a state home to the US’s largest Arab American population. “I will do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza” Harris said. Yeah, sure.
There’s no guarantee, obviously, that Trump would be any better for Palestinians.
3. As for Ukraine, everyone agrees that a Trump administration would diminish the support for Ukraine, possibly pushing for a peace deal in which Russia keeps all its territorial gains, whereas Ukraine, well, is fucked up. Well, not quite everyone. Sir Niall Ferguson hopes that a Trump administration would give more leeway to Ukraine regarding the use of Western weapons against targets in Russia. I beg to differ. But he also refuses to say if he’ll vote for Trump (since 2018 he’s also an American citizen). “The ballot is secret for a reason.” Indeed, and you’re wearing pants to hide your pussy. There’s a reason in everything.
4. After Zelenskyy has urged Ukraine’s allies to “stop watching” and take steps before North Korean troops deployed in Russia reach the frontline, and he even raised the prospect of a preemptive Ukrainian strike on camps where the North Korean troops are being trained, guess what? Andrii Kovalenko, the head of the counter-disinformation department at Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, reported that “The first North Korean soldiers stationed in Russia’s Kursk Oblast to aid Moscow’s war have come under fire.”
This might be the end of Ukraine, or the start of World War III. Notwithstanding Ukraine’s right of self-defense in a war in which Russia has committed unparalleled atrocities, and regardless of the fact that Putin’s is a murderous regime at home and abroad, there is really a red line having been crossed here.
Ukraine has no business to do in the Kursk region, which is Russian territory proper. It’s one thing to attack airbases from which you’re attacked, and a completely different issue to attack foreign troops on foreign territory when the two “foreign” don’t even designate the same country! DPRK is a shithole of a country, and its troops might not make much of a difference (are they 12,000 in Russia, or 10,000, or maybe 8,000?), but no laws of war allow for such “preemptive” strokes!
I have the feeling that this war will end in 2-3 months at most, with Ukraine being a complete loser. The Kursk incursion would then have proven a completely retarded decision.
Pragmatically, and purely for the hatred of a US-centric world, the global South has come to peace with all the crimes of Putin’s and of Xi’s. It’s not just BRICS. Counting by heads, more people on this planet are now with Russia and China than with the global West (or North). Sure thing, they don’t have to live in Russia, and they mostly don’t even notice how they’re manipulated by the Russian disinformation machine (the “hybrid war”), but with the utmost distrust in the US and the visible decaying of Europe, I suppose they have mitigating circumstances. We have to face the reality. And Ukraine’s stupidity doesn’t play in its favor.
Nor does the American dumbness. Locations of Ukrainian weapons systems were shown in recently updated images on Google Maps, apparently. “What is wrong with this world?” Well, it’s Русский мир, I suppose.
5. A quick recommendation. Riz Khan of Al Arabiya English: 🎞️ Philosopher Slavoj Žižek: Israel Needed This War In Gaza To Create A Greater Israel (Full Interview).
Slavoj Žižek talks about EVERYTHING (because he was asked about everything). The headline is a bit of a clickbait. But indeed, this is consistent with the opinion I expressed more than 6 weeks ago.
Soft fascism will replace liberal democracy. Strong leaders, strong figures, should have dignity and emanate spontaneous authority. Both Trump and Putin are not so. BRICS. Censorship from both the ultraconservative right and liberal left happens because governments have a deep mistrust in ordinary people. Cynical indifference is the danger, not fundamentalism. Pure neutrality cannot exist; truth is a category of subjective involvement. And more, as Žižek is Žižek.
6. BONUS: Suggested by YouTube, a compilation of stances of the late Christopher Hitchens on Israel and Palestine.
As someone in one of those swing states, my take in your comments:
1) Now, I just refuse to watch SNL (Washington’s Dream was their best sketch though!)
2) Concerned and educated Americans had a difficulty to ponder who would be better with Palestinians, Kamala or Trump. After hearing both their statements and correlating to their personalities, Kamala would probably let Israel pursue anything their want, just to keep it less on the media. She can even go after Iran where the US would have to intervene. Trump would let free reign to Israel without no restrictions (he would be ok even to close all internet to Gaza so no hard photos), but his patience for Trump for a continuous war is limited and he will demand an end in a few months. Regarding Iran, he is completely adverse to US getting directly involved, but Israel can easily put him in the spot. Regardless of their difference, both are ok with the genocide so any decent person should not vote for any of them, period.
3) I agree fully with you. Trump will demand immediately a negotiation and end hostilities before spring. Now, the military would scare the hell out of him of the “consequences”… I think, this time around, he would not yield though. With Kamala, the war would continue but with less intensity until Putin decides to put it a stop (I really think Putin is in the standby waiting for Trump rather than being force to militarily finish it and then not knowing what to do with the rest of Ukraine that would never would be able to dominate, something like US’ Afghanistan).
4) I agree with you again. The North Korean thing is just a gimmick to show “I have allies” too and North Korea shows the South my guys are actually getting really trained. Of course, China has given the green light here. Zeleskii tried to bring it to attention but it failed… no one cares what he says now.
On the, “crimes of Putin’s and of Xi’s”, sure they may have many, but nothing in comparison with what the US had… just pick any single year in the last 40 and I tell you who caused more deaths in the world. Putin and Xi probably would cause havoc to enemies like the US does if they could get away with, but the reality is that, so far, they haven’t. If we talk about democracies in the world, in the last 4 decades, the US also has busted more than Russia did too.
5) “Governments have a deep mistrust in ordinary people” True! And vice versa!
“Cynical indifference is the danger, not fundamentalism”. Interesting… You have convinced me! It does seem very plausible. What you think is the cause of that? Could it be overload of data? Social media?
I don’t need to persuade you about anything, except maybe to watch/listen to Žižek. I’ve spent many hours in the last decade* doing that. (*and I mean decenio; in some languages, such as French and Romanian, many people use the term for “ten days” [FR décade, RO decadă] instead of the term for “ten years” [FR décennie, RO deceniu]; but it’s about ten years here; I know this is unambiguous in Spanish [década = decenio, except that usually década is a “round decade” such as “the 80s”], but some other readers might be unsure.)
Russia vs. the US: For once, stop thinking of the wars! Russia is an abomination FOR ITS OWN CITIZENS! Get f-informed about the real conditions and the torture in their penal colonies! (At least in the US they’re suing the Florida Department of Corrections for concrete prisons without A/C and with non-working ventilation contributing to deaths; in Russia they can’t even do that. Of course, ill treatments are widespread in the US correctional system too, including e.g. “situations” and lawsuits involving, in NY alone, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Rikers Island, Bare Hill Correctional Facility, and the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The UN Committee against Torture has expressed “extreme concern” over deaths in US jails and prisons due to unbearable temperatures, being it winter or summer.) But torture in Russia’s prisons is more systematic than in Soviet times, and abuses in the military also are way beyond those experienced under the rule of the Communist Party. Deaths in Russia’s prisons are never truly investigated, because in most cases they are plain murders. Here’s a recent example.
Cynical indifference in the US, plain cynicism in Russia… or is it the other way around?
I’ll listen to Žižek later today.
On Russia, I was talking on who were worse for humanity in the last 4 decades. If you choose on number of deaths by wars and sanctions, sorry, the US take the lead by a humongous difference. Now, if Russia could, probably they would too, but US won on that camp.
On human right violations on its own citizens? Wow… it is hard to assess. If today I am a critic of the government, of course I would rather prefer being in the US than Russia. Now, Putin’s Russia is constantly in an existential threat where the US is actively pursuing his demise and of Russia as a single state too. Was the US in such a threat, absolutely no doubt the US would have be extremely hard with ANY internal critics too.
Now, looking at incarcerated people, you sure know no one country beats US with its 541 per 100,000 population (Russia’s 304) and EU countries in the 70-200 range. I did a work on US prison system in 1999 and was appalling in conditions and treatment and I think it has not gotten any better since… Let’s see, the US Bureau of Justice Statistics found average age of death for a prisoner in the US is 47 yrs old (median 49)!!! What do you call that, natural death?! Let’s not even mention the conditions for “terrorist” or “enemies of state” inmates without any normal judicial, let alone human guarantees.
As the US hegemony gets eroded more and more you will see the US’s freedoms more and more being removed in all arenas. I consider the US and Russia governments, animals of the very same nature, just different circumstances may them appear different, but under the same circumstances, they would act the same to criticism. Europe needs to learn how to maneuver between with these two rather than picking one or the other.
Nope, by no means. Nobody attacked Russia, militarily. NOBODY. Since 1941.
Otherwise, WE ALL are under an existential threat, but not only from the US; it’s mostly from China, and the weapons are economic, not military. For now. Of course, it’s West’s fault, because the capitalists themselves MOVED their factories to China! Meanwhile, China has its own engineers, designers, scientists, etc., AND YET, Germany still moves part of its production to China and India! That’s suicide.
I know that the US is a “penitentiary state” (so to speak) but, believe me, you don’t want to be in a Russian jail. The average age of death among prisoners is irrelevant, because it depends on the age of people upon incarceration.
Hundreds of US bases all around Russia kind of makes you ponder if I was in Moscow. It is not secret that the US policy is dismembering Russia as it did with Yugoslavia. Of course, it cannot do it directly, so the US finds groups within to do the job for them. The same did with Iraq (Shias), in Afghanistan (Northern alliance), Syria (fundamentalists), Libya (NTC and Libyan Islamic Fighting Group), Egypt (army)…
On China, too much to unpack here, I’ll leave it to another time but I mostly disagree with the rational. China, for now, I don’t see it being abusive to Europe, Africa or most of Asia. I hope I have the chance to exchange opinions on it later… yet I have a feeling, we are not as apart on our vision of the world as it seems in these texts.
I don’t blame China! I blame the rest of the world (I mean “the West”) for being so stupid!
About Washington’s Dream: I’ve seen worse, but SNL has much, much better satire. You’re wrong to avoid all those shows and names I mentioned. You’re also a bit paranoid to avoid using YT directly.
The stupidity of the Imperial System has also a US addition: when I see on a bottle “fl oz” I never know if it’s “US fl oz” or “UK fl oz” (the same is valid for gal, pt, qt). As for the nautical mile vs. statute/terrestrial mile…
Ha ha… I don’t know, I may have seen some SNL 20 sketches in my life and only really liked 4 or 5 of them being Washington’s Dream my favorite. I find it hard to move into comedy in the last decade… I know I should, but can’t.
I see you changed my invidious link for the YouTube’s… I am no paranoiac, I am being guided far, far more by principle than privacy (whether I use one or the other link does not give Alphabet any more valuable data). It is my little rebellion in a world where the government is not tackling these monopolies as they would have done in the past (AT&T, US Steel, Standard Oil, Western Union…), so we have too. For now, for me, it is just a curiosity, soon and easily, it may not longer be.
I’m not a fan of SNL, but in the last 35 years I’ve watched THOUSANDS of political or not-that-political US shows of all kinds. Larry King, Jay Leno, Oprah Winfrey, David Letterman, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, John Oliver, Jimmy Kimmel, etc. etc.
NOTE: I never believed in the “American Dream”! Generally, I’m a non-believer in myths.
– Larry King? Gosh, I though we were same age! I did watch some of his interviews but the media soon ripped him apart for airing it on RT. RIP.
– Jay Leno. Never found it funny, his latest passion for cars seems more genuine.
– Oprah. Never. She did missed a real chance in 2016 for US presidency!
– David Letterman. Same as Leno.
– Jon Stewart. Intelligent fellow some humor.
– Stephen Colbert, his first seasons really good. Unbearable ever since.
– Bill Maher. Felt for the guy for a few shows, then he truly showed himself as an A$$.
– Oliver. Like Colbert, loved his humor on the first two years and bringing 1h shows in a single topic was enlightening. Now, it’s just pro Democrats.
– Jimmy Kimmel. Like Leno.
Despite of detesting its wars since always, I believed in the American Dream in my teens. Then, I came and grasp a bit of it until to, very quickly, witness how fast it was vanishing before our eyes. Retrospectively, I see that, if that dream ever existed, it was gone already by the time I came.
My year of birth is in the logo. But again, believing in “big dreams” (America, Communism, Heavens, whatever) was not my forte.
I don’t even understand those wearing t-shirts with Che Guevara. If anything, it should be Fidel there. Same for those nostalgic after Lenin. Really? Why not Trotsky?
Oh, Larry King and RT: that was probably a mistake. At first, RT seemed genuinely a “more independent” news source, but then…
He he… completely agree on the t-shirts!!
RT, in the early 2010s, for all their US journalists, it was the only venue of earning an income and, ironically, not having an editorial control. I even remember some heavily criticized the taking of Crimea and weren’t fired. Of course, RT had an agenda of bringing journalists with a US critical vision, but these journalists were in no shape or form supporters of Kremlin. Of course, a decade later, the US media that can pay a salary lacks completely of any investigative journalist that may be critical of US foreign policy so every single one of them has to resort to internet (Seymour Hersh, Greenwald,…) and now the media, can dismiss them all with an “oh, he is just a youtuber”.
YT suggested me the 2nd in the series: Washington’s Dream 2.
But America is quite simple. Here’s how the French count their school years: CP-CE1-CE2-CM1-CM2-6e-5e-4e-3e-2de-1re-Terminale. Yes, they just can’t count normally like other people from 1 to 12, 1 to 11, 1 to 13, whatever (with or without the “grade zero” which is something between kindergarten and the 1st grade; CP = cours préparatoire).
I have watched 1.5h of Žižek… I see you are quite influenced by him (cynicism and indifference of society). Good material! Of course, when it comes to Russia, I differ a bit from you both; but being from Spain, I come from a different type of historical background so I have to give you more weigh in your point of view here than I usually would.
On Ukraine… one commenter under the video you cited said it best: “…few days after the Russian invasion, Zelensky agreed to the neutrality of Ukraine and began negotiations in Turkey, where the final Ukrainian consent to the Minsk agreements was discussed. Ukraine would lose Crimea, where there was a referendum on joining Russia (which the West did not recognize), similar to the one in Kosovo on independence, (which the West recognized) and give some autonomy to areas inhabited mainly by Russians. If Zelensky/Ukraine would agree to it, he would have his own state and nation, albeit neutral (like Austria)… But then Boris Johnson comes to Zelensky and tells him to leave the negotiations and fight until the return of the last inch of former Ukrainian territory…”
He forgot to mention probably close to half a million soldiers would still be alive today (and European finances healthier). With the exception of Israel, nowadays no country wants to invade other to keep it*, it is a financial nightmare. Russia just wanted Eastern Ukrainians keep blocking Kyiv on making constitutional changes regarding NATO and Crimea but for US, that was not acceptable, and while Yanukovych was going to be voted out anyway in 11 months, US staged the coup to break with that constitutional impasse on NATO. Easter Ukrainians never got their vote back, so Russia decided to keep Crimea (and most Crimeans agreed)… and the rest is history. Putin now is in a political (not military!) conundrum; negotiate Ukraine neutrality and keeping the land as is or, going after Odessa a leave the rest of Ukraine insignificant, that should be enough buffer zone, but with instability for many years to come. Russia never had the intention of annexing Ukraine. Even before the invasion with a letter to NATO a couple of months before, Putin begged for negotiation, Washington did not cede. Now Washington has other priorities and will tell a weak Europe to keep pushing the war.
China has a bit of the same problem. It wants Taiwan back, but it cannot change Taiwanese minds on it so Beijing was kind of satisfied with the status quo. It is the US, who has decided to rapidly increase the militarizing of Taiwan and sending higher and higher officials to visit the island to provoke China… I won’t approve any invasion or, more likely, blockade, but, like with Russia, I see why Beijing one day would find it necessary to do what it never wanted to do. Offer China today to take officially Taiwan back (as UN recognizes it is one) but to leave the island political system intact and militarily free for 100 years and Beijing would sign it that same week. However, the US would rather see the island set ablaze!
* I remember US did invade Grenada (population then 90,000) with the intention to keep it, but after two decades it decided to leave it still… Today colonialism is “as long it is your trade partner (or exploitable), you don’t want to stay to pay the pensions of people who do not like you!”
1.5h of Žižek… so he’s literally new to you! Beyond pure philosophy, you should watch: The Pervert’s Guide to Cinema (2006), The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology (2012).
Of course, Žižek and I have different experiences than you with the Soviets. Also, “the Russian soul” and “the Russian mindset” are much better known here, as we lived with them or near them for hundreds of years.
The Boris Johnson myth: I’ve heard it hundreds of times. I don’t believe it corresponds to what happened. It’s the Russian narrative. Simply put, I believe it to be a lie, with only 20% chances of being a truth.
I don’t believe that Taiwan should belong to China. But I also don’t believe that San Marino, Monaco, Andorra, Gibraltar, the Channel Islands, Isle of Man, the Faroe Islands, the Åland Islands, Svalbard, Lichtenstein, Ceuta and Melilla should have their current statuses. Also, the allies were incredibly retarded to allow the USSR the Kaliningrad exclave, to which Russia didn’t have any real historical rights.
Ha ha… you are not going to have many friends left in this world if you keep allowing islands and enclaves to have self-determination!! I mentioned once my personal struggle with the self-determination right… after many, many hundreds of hours of researching, 20 yrs of thinking it and witnessing the the evolution in Yugoslavia and Catalonia and Spain’s apparent “contradiction” with Gibraltar and Ceuta, I have now a much clearer idea on the case; surprisingly or… unsurprisingly, UN’s definition and classification of land that have that right is quite comprehensive!
Of course it could have been an excuse by Moscow when Boris urgently came to Zeleskii in the middle of the negotiation talks… but then, Oleksiy Arestovych (Zeleskii advisor and war’s spokerperson) confirmed it, so did David Arahamiya (Ukraine’s ruling party leader), and Gerhard Schroeder (that was in Istanbul’s negotiations) and some others… Of course, in these times one has to be very careful with these claims since a lot is thrown into the wall to see what sticks, but regarding this claim, and that the 2 Minsk Agreements were to gain time to arm Ukraine… it was well confirmed by many actors there.
Well, let’s get ready for this Tuesday’s elections.
You certainly meant if I keep denying self-determination to islands and enclaves!
This is the guy you trust? Former Ukrainian presidential advisor Oleksiy Arestovych flees into exile, to challenge Zelenskiy for presidency. Oh, because… Top Ukrainian politician Oleksiy Arestovych gives seventh confirmation of Russia-Ukraine peace deal agreed in March 2022. OK, he can remember what he first said, and he can repeat it as required.
The theory you adhere to:
I’m sorry, but this planet is populated by retards.
1. “90% of an agreement” is not an agreement. “Directly meeting Putin” as the “next step in the negotiations” isn’t, either. It’s not even 90%. It’s like in those public works projects when they report “96% completed” but one year later, it’s still not completed.
2. Zelensky would have NEVER accepted neutrality (à la Austria, or à la Moldova, but Moldova doesn’t want it anymore). NEVER.
3. Nonetheless, prior to the war, there was NEVER a concrete plan of an adhesion to NATO. The plan was to join the EU. There were Western factories in Ukraine (Krups, DeLonghi, others), not only Chinese landowners. The EU wanted to scrap the import taxes.
4. Boris Johnson is not NATO.
5. Gerhard Schröder is a piece of shit and the utmost scumbag. Even purely economically, he betrayed Germany for Russia. 100% foreign agent. Funny thing that he should say, “nothing could happen because everything else was decided in Washington…. the Ukrainians did not agree to peace because they were not allowed to. They first had to ask the Americans about everything they discussed.” Schröder doesn’t take a piss without approval from Moscow!
6. Oleksiy Arestovych is opposing Zelensky, so he can say whatever he feels like.
7. David Arakhamia was indeed the chief negotiator, but once the negotiations failed, he might want to brag about how close he was to saving Ukraine. But even if Moscow was “ready to end the war if we took neutrality… and made commitments that we would not join Nato”, this doesn’t mean that Zelensky was ready to assume forever neutrality. Most likely not. When a neighbor attacks you, NO MATTER THE REASON, and promises to retreat and leave you alone if you declare neutrality, you must be completely retarded to accept such an offer! Moreover, whoever KNOWS how Russia has ALWAYS behaved in the last 300 years must know that Russia cannot be trusted IN SUCH MATTERS.
Also, what David Arakhamia “revealed” comes from The European Conservative, a Hungarian “nonprofit” organization that is 110% pro-Viktor Orbán. Highly trusted. Not.
As for “we opened the champagne bottle”… this is retarded. Nobody does that. It’s a fucking armistice, not a wedding!
8. WaPo: “For some in Nato, it’s better for Ukrainians to keep fighting and dying than to achieve a peace that comes too soon or at too high a price for Kyiv and the rest of Europe.” The “too soon” part is 100% crap, dear Bezos. “At too high a price for Kyiv and the rest of Europe” does make sense. So Zelensky was able to judge for himself. Again, Boris Clownson didn’t represent NATO, and even less Europe or the EU.
9. Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu is, like Turkey (Türkye, as the bastards want to be called these days: they dictate on foreign languages!), is 50% pro-Kremlin, 50% pro-NATO, and 100% pro-Erdoğan, which is a whore. “They want Russia to become weaker.” Oh, because Türkye wants Russia to become stronger? Good to know.
10. “Meeting in Turkey, the two sides produced the Istanbul communiqué in late March 2022 in which Ukraine promised not to join Nato or allow foreign military bases on its soil. For its part, Russia promised to withdraw its occupation troops from Ukraine, although not from the Donbas region or the Crimea.” I want to see that communiqué, but there is no link to it. The link goes to a Brave New Europe article! It was a proposal. Actually, a set of 10 proposals. No part was 100% ready to sign it.
11. Naftali Bennett said that “both sides were very interested in a ceasefire… and both sides were prepared to make considerable concessions…” Oh, that communiqué! From that Brave New Europe rag!
That article (the only one that gives the supposed communiqué) is written by three German traitors, one of which is “General (ret.) Harald Kujat, [who] was the highest ranging German officer of the Bundeswehr and at NATO.” I’ve heard of this guy! He’s 100% pro-Kremlin! I remember having watched this interview of his: Die 7 Mythen des Ukraine-Krieges – Widerlegt! // Ex-NATO General Harald Kujat. A complete ass. He should be stripped of his military pension. WHEN WILL PEOPLE STOP DEFENDING MOSCOW?
Wow, everyone is so well-informed! Everyone knows everything! He said, he said, she said, he said… and in the end Boris Clownson’s role is disputed!
he he… at least I see you well-informed, so I give you the benefit of the doubt now… interesting opinion on Gerhard Schröder too 😉 I have no clue on German politics, yet appalled on what it seems to have become. I want to sell my Nomos watch now… but for the moment I won’t change my name yet.
And go to bed Béranger!! Gosh, what time is there!
The problem is like this (and this is valid for John Mearsheimer too; here’s his latest, on Al Jazeera English: Politics, policies & power: John Mearsheimer’s blunt analysis | Centre Stage): people should understand that criticizing the United States does not necessarily imply that Russia has to be praised for its recent actions! And yet, they somehow correlate the two. (Not all of them do that, though.)
Nomos are very elegant, but too expensive for what they are. OK, they have this extremely nice caliber, though.
Wow, since when is NBC loving JD Vance? Why this interview with him? And what a nice guy! (Two hispanos at that…)
I am going to recognize this; probably 90% of what I have seen in a screen on the US campaign was your links so go figure! I really don’t care. I do see and hear the people and yard signs on the street and stores… and I had predicted the winner, so far, in the last 2 decades, even 2016 (I have not lived here continuously though). Vance seems far more positively talked on than the Democrat… and I even sense a bit of envy on the Democrats.
As you guessed, I do like most, not all, of what Mearsheimer says, but I do struggle to tell apart good argumenters (Mearsheimer?) and just-plain-cheerleaders (Ritter?).
I did liked Nomos Ahoi (2014’s). I am not into watches but did like its elegant lines and mystic color yet toughness. But, with the German political (not the economical) debacle of the last 3 years I have to recognize I do feel less attached and would not have it bought it today. That brings me to ponder: What percentage of loss of sales of VW and Mercedes is due to competitiveness and what to people “feelings” on today’s Germany? I bet Nomos Glashutte could tell us better than anyone!
Why are there Kamala signs everywhere since a day ago? Did I miss something? Is this a planned last push? Don’t think will over power Trump’s lead but amazed at the change… 80% of Kamala’s yard signs were not there 2 days ago in this swing state!
Also 23°C in the north east in November (here in Nov usually ranges between 8 and 2°C)… tons of people outside! This probably mobilizes those on the fence whether to go vote or not…. God has taking a side!?
God is dead.
But yes, K is trying to swing the swing states.